The Importance of Being Honest

This Sunday was the Virginia Beach half-marathon, which took place on a humid Tidewater morning.  I was one of 20,000 participants, hitting the course at  7:05 a.m. as we jogged past rock bands, cheerleaders and semi-celebrity attendees (was that Frank Shorter?)

My best time at VA Beach was 1:53:54, which I accomplished in 2010.  The year before I broke the tape in 1:54:10.  So I was assuming I’d break two hours and actually hoping to flirt with 1 hour 50 minutes.

Instead, I staggered home in 2:02:17.  Bummer.

I could blame the hot weather or perhaps over-training (I ran fifty miles last week while staying in Sandbridge).  But the reality is I’m just an average aging athlete.  That’s what I can do.

That brings me around to Paul Ryan’s bizarre claim that he ran a marathon in “under three hours” or “the high two’s,” when he was a young man.  In other words, he averaged under 7 minutes a mile while running twenty-six miles.

That’s a very strong statement, along the lines of “I dated Cameron Diaz, before I met my current beautiful wife.”

If you’re going to claim it publicly, you better have photos.

Unfortunately for Ryan, the evidence shows that he ran only one marathon and finished in four hours and one minute.  That’s not exactly “high two’s.” Hey, Paul, my best marathon time is 4 hours 22 minutes.  (Of course, I was forty).

Now you might say that this issue has little or no application to the issues facing the United States.  And you would be right.  Ryan appears to keep himself in excellent physical shape (thumbs up for P90X) and undoubtedly his marathon boasting was meant to emphasize this fact.

But Ryan’s misrepresentation is more than just casual boasting — or another exaggerated statement which come so easily to politicians.  Indeed, it goes to the very essence of long distance running.

Unlike in team sports, the runner competes with himself.  There is no scoreboard, no cheering crowds, no cash rewards.  Unlike in rugby, there’s not even a post-match lager with teammates.  It’s a lonely world in which physical suffering is the coin of the realm.

When you shave your time by a few minutes or an hour, you’re not cheating anyone — you’re just creating a false impression for an audience of one.  Because who else cares?

There’s no dishonor in finishing a marathon in an average or above-average time, as long as you honestly compete.  Just have the confidence to be the man (or woman) that you really are.

 

 

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Janice Miller

    Embellishing your marathon time is a little like cheating at golf — a game where you keep your own score. If you don’t keep an accurate score — you only cheat yourself. It’s something to think about!

    • DJRippert

      Yes, and Bill Clinton was absolutely famous for cheating at golf. He constantly and perpetually cheated. Player after player after player complained about Clinton’s rampant cheating. Once may be a mistake. Twice could be very bad luck. But over and over again? That’s just rampant dishonesty.

  • DJRippert

    They’re gonna put y’all back in chains.

    Three letters. JOBS. J-O-B-S.

    You can’t go into a 7-11 without having a little Indian accent.

    Chap, I would be very careful about criticizing the mis-statements of the Vice Presidential Candidates. Paul Ryan was answering a question and may have confused being around four hours but thought of three hours. As for the 4:01 – I have run two marathons. Before the electronic timers that runners now wear, you would have two times – you official finish time and your official finish time minus the time it took you to get to the starting line at the beginning of the race. I ran the Marine Corps Marathon twice. Both times it took me many minutes to reach the starting line. I think it’s quite fair to subtract that time from the finish time when reporting how long it took to run the marathon. Therefore, an official finish time of 4:01 minus 5 to 8 minutes to reach the starting line would be a honest “high threes” finish.

    He meant to say “high threes”. Instead, he said “high twos”. I see an honest mistake since “high twos” is pretty remarkable and would be pretty quickly debunked.

  • Chap Petersen

    DJR: You’re working hard to protect your man and I respect that. But your logic doesn’t hold for 3 reasons: (1) Ryan described himself as a “fast” runner in the interview so he was obviously creating the expectation that he was an elite marathoner, not a 4-hour man, (2) Ryan, like every national candidate, travels with an entourage who vet every public statement for accuracy and I”m sure they asked him about that one, and (3) every runner I know hand-times from start to finish to keep track of their individual time, (I’ve never checked my official time in my life).

    Again, this is a minor issue. But it’s a lesson learned for him..

  • Anonymous

    I agree. Ryan is not “confused”. He calculates these statements and he apparently thinks that few really check what he is saying. It’s not only a bad habit, it betrays contempt for the public.